Postautor: IZRAELSit » 19 maja 2021, 8:08
Кабринский Эдуард - Azure devops tags - Кабринский Рдуард
<h1>Azure devops tags</h1>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Azure devops tags <a href="http://remmont.com">Headlines</a> Azure devops tags
<h1>Example Build/Release Pipeline with Azure DevOps</h1>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://miro.medium.com/fit/c/96/96/2*g ... 2vOg9w.png" /></p>
<p>My team recently inherited several C# Class Library repositories ? unfortunately, none of them had a proper build pipeline set up.</em></p>
<p>I got the task of setting up the build/release pipeline in Azure DevOps.</em></p>
<p>Here?s what I did.</em></p>
<h1>Branching Strategy</h1>
<p>Looking through the commit history, it looked like the previous team was using trunk development workflow. In other words, there was no branching strategy to speak of? all commits were pushed straight to master.</p>
<p>While that works for some teams, it?s definitely not something my team is comfortable with. We use a variation of GitHub flow:</p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://miro.medium.com/max/60/1*yV50uo ... KdgiKA.png" /></p>
<p>The main difference comes from the way we release:</p>
<p><ul>
<li>At any time during development, developers may trigger a pre-release by pushing tags.</li>
<li>After merging to master, we trigger a production release by adding a tag. In our workflow, production tags are applied only after merging to master because we always squash merge pull requests.</em></li>
</ul>
</p>
<h1>The Project To Be Built</h1>
<p>The codebase we inherited are private repos, so for demonstration purposes I?ve created an example project which has a similar structure to the way the private codebase was set up.</p>
<p>Here?s what the project looks like:</p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="https://miro.medium.com/max/60/1*2jAuPa ... suGBMA.png" /></p>
<p>And here?s how the folder structure looks like:</p>
<h1>Requirements</h1>
<p>Based on our workflow, we have to cater for the following scenarios:</p>
<p><ol>
<li>Commits are pushed: Build & Test only</em></li>
<li>Tags are pushed: Build, Test and Release (push to nuget repository)</em></li>
<li>Pull requests: Build & Test only</em></li>
<li>Daily builds: Build & Test only</em></li>
</ol>
</p>
<blockquote><p>Note: Daily builds became a requirement because in the past we?d inherited legacy code which had no active development in a year (sometimes even longer). And when we had to add a change or hotfix, we?d find the thing wouldn?t even build. Daily builds was our way of ensuring any code we were responsible for was, at the very least, healthy enough to build!</p></blockquote>
<p>Additionally, we need to ensure the following:</p>
<p>a) On release, verify that the tag conforms to semantic versioning. This is because nuget uses semantic versioning, and trying to push non-conforming packages to a nuget feed will result in errors</p>
<p>b) No pushing directly to master branch</p>
<p>c) Pull requests must be approved by another developer on the team</p>
<p>d) When merging, pull requests must use squash merge</p>
<h1>azure-pipelines.yml</h1>
<p>If you?re just interested in what the azure-pipeline file looked like, here it is. I?ve left comments to explain what each section is for.</p>
<h2>Azure devops tags</h2>
<h3>Azure devops tags</h3>
<p>[youtube]</p>
Azure devops tags <a href="http://remmont.com">World news</a> Azure devops tags
<h4>Azure devops tags</h4>
Setting up a CI/CD pipeline for .NET project using Azure DevOps Pipelines yaml, pipeline as code, continuous delivery using Azure DevOps
<h5>Azure devops tags</h5>
Azure devops tags <a href="http://remmont.com">Azure devops tags</a> Azure devops tags
SOURCE: <h6>Azure devops tags</h6> <a href="https://dev-ops.engineer/">Azure devops tags</a> Azure devops tags
#tags#[replace: -,-Azure devops tags] Azure devops tags#tags#
Эдуард Кабринский
current news